See how experts put together the pieces of the crime puzzle. As each episode shows, every criminal leaves a clue behind. Each show features a different forensic. Forensic Files (season 12) Country of origin: United States: Release; Original network: truTV: Original release: September 26, 2007 () – April 17, 2008 () Season. At Forensic Files ® he is jokingly referred to as “the franchise.” Peter has been in this business for more than 50 years – narrating Academy Award winning.

Forensic Files Season 4 Episode 11

I am a big fan of Forensic Files. This is one of my all time favorite tv show ever. I bought all 8 set of DVD and they are great. However, I would like to collect.

Forensic Files Season 4 Episode 11

Forensic Files (season 1. Wikipedia. Forensic Files is an American documentary- style series which reveals how forensic science is used to solve violent crimes, mysterious accidents, and even outbreaks of illness. The show is broadcast on tru.

TV, narrated by Peter Thomas, and produced by Medstar Television, in association with tru. TV Original Productions. Watch Backwards Online Hitfix.

It has broadcast 4. TLC in 1. 99. 6 as Medical Detectives. Episodes. But cutting- edge technology from NASA enabled a forensic odontologist to prove the wrong man was behind bars. With the killer still on the loose, the investigation was far from over.

But in this case, it was far from clear. It looked like the killer vanished into thin air.. Then they learned that, six years earlier in a nearby town, a young police officer died in the same way. The men had one thing in common: At the time of their deaths, they were married to the same woman.

She was never seen again, but through the evidence she left behind, she was able to tell investigators what happened to her and who was responsible. Watch The Lawnmower Man Online Freeform. Investigators had to find a way to solve a murder case with evidence which consisted of a squashed tomato found at the crime scene, and tiny, pinpoint reflections of light in a photograph. Would it be enough to catch a killer? Investigators turned to forensic science, hoping to find the answers they needed. More than a decade would pass before the evidence collected by an extraordinarily prescient medical examiner could be used by forensic scientists to identify the killer.

With the help of a professor of geological sciences, police hoped to get the ? His wife had taken her own life, and his college sweetheart had killed herself in much the same fashion fourteen years earlier.

Investigators had to determine if this was a bizarre coincidence, or an attempt to get away with murder.. During their investigation, police learned that her 2. Tyrone Montgomery was in love with her and that she had spurned his advances. They now had to determine if love had turned into obsession.. A pair of men's tennis shoes was discovered near her body. Police were sure that if they found the man who fit the shoes, they would also find the man who committed the crime.

Two years later, a latent print examiner, new to the county and the crime lab, changed the course of the investigation by sharing a little- known fact with his colleagues. And that alone gave investigators a head start. Their most promising lead was an unusual one: a bloody fingerprint on the body of one of the victims. The killer was not seen by their downstairs roommate, but he left his DNA behind in some cigarette butts and a groundbreaking test revealed his race and even the color of his eyes and hair. When this information was made public, Eric Copple went to the police and confessed.

He had no money, no lawyer and only a fifth grade education, but he never gave up. He turned to the law books in the prison library and television programmes about forensic science, and set out to prove his innocence. An expert in canine behaviour was convinced the killer knew both the victim and the animals, and he was determined find out exactly what the dogs had seen.

But investigators saw through the attempt almost immediately, and they turned to forensic science to learn what really happened that night. The girl said he was her Uncle Clarence, and he was convicted because of her identification. She recanted her testimony years later, but the court denied Clarence's petition for a new trial. His wife was convinced he was innocent, and decided to conduct her own investigation to prove it. Investigators had plenty of suspects, including former boyfriend David Kyle Gilley, but no conclusive evidence linking any of them to the crime.

More than a decade later, sophisticated technology would breathe new life into a case grown cold with the passage of time, which would implicate Gilley. Police were especially concerned when they realised the victim had come to them for protection just two weeks earlier, after a road rage incident. Concern turned to dread when the evidence began to point not to an aggressive driver, but to one of their fellow police officers. Her brother promised he'd find out who was responsible and bring the killer to justice. It would take more than thirty years, but the young man kept his promise and, in doing so, brought closure to his family.

At first, investigators thought their 1. Based on the Murder of Diane and Alan Scott Johnson.

The evidence at the crime scene didn't match any of the suspects and, after the initial investigation, the case went cold for ten years. Then a witness who had been silent for more than a decade decided to do the right thing. NOTE: The prosecutor featured in this episode, Trey Gowdy, would later become a United States Congressman. But the motive turned out to be something age old, something with which investigators were all too familiar: greed, fueled by obsession.

A forensic anthropologist was able to determine the victim's race, age and height, but it would take an inventive computer consultant to give her a face and a name. Instead of floating downstream, it became entangled in overhanging branches. Watch Fear Of The Dark Online (2017). Days later, when police found it, they hoped clues to the killer's identity and the solution to the crime were . But the autopsy proved this was no accident. It was arson and murder.

Investigators had to determine who wanted the woman dead.. More than a decade would pass before a phone call breathed life into the cold case, and a paint smear on the bottom of the victim's boot helped scientists determine what happened during the last hour of his life. Five years earlier, a student was assaulted and killed in her off- campus apartment and, a year after that, another student was killed in almost the same way.

Police feared a serial killer was on the loose and they needed to determine what – or who – these women had in common.